From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramirez v. Cornerstone Building Brands

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 29, 2021
2:21-cv-01017-MCE-JDP (E.D. Cal. Jun. 29, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-01017-MCE-JDP

06-29-2021

CLAUDIA RAMIREZ, ESMERALDA LIZBETH MENDEZ LOZANO, LILIAN CABRERA, ANA ROSA MENDOZA, ALICIA FERNANDEZ, DULCE NIETO, ROSA HERNANDEZ, individually, and on behalf of other members of the general public similarly situated Plaintiffs, v. CORNERSTONE BUILDING BRANDS, an unknown business entity; PLY GEM WINDOWS, an unknown business entity; PLY GEM PACIFIC WINDOWS CORPORATION, an unknown business entity; PLY GEM RESIDENTIAL SOLUTIONS, an unknown business entity; SIMONTON DOORS & WINDOWS, an unknown business entity; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO CONTINUE PLAINTIFFS' DEADLINE TO FILE MOTION TO STRIKE

MORRISON C. ENGLAND. JR, SENIOR UNITED STATESDISTRICT JUDGE

ORDER

Having considered the parties' Joint Stipulation to Extend Time to File Motion to Strike Answer, and good cause appearing, the Court hereby approves the Joint Stipulation and ORDERS that the deadline for Plaintiff to file a motion to strike Defendants' Answer is continued 21 days after the hearing on Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Ramirez v. Cornerstone Building Brands

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 29, 2021
2:21-cv-01017-MCE-JDP (E.D. Cal. Jun. 29, 2021)
Case details for

Ramirez v. Cornerstone Building Brands

Case Details

Full title:CLAUDIA RAMIREZ, ESMERALDA LIZBETH MENDEZ LOZANO, LILIAN CABRERA, ANA ROSA…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 29, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-01017-MCE-JDP (E.D. Cal. Jun. 29, 2021)