From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramirez v. Colony SQ Condo

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Feb 8, 2008
No. 05-07-01326-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 8, 2008)

Opinion

No. 05-07-01326-CV.

Opinion Filed February 8, 2008.

On Appeal from the 298th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. 06-03196.

Before Justices O'NEILL, RICHTER, and LANG.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


On October 3, 2007, appellants filed a notice of appeal indicating they are appealing the trial court's order granting appellee's Mary Simmons' motion for summary judgment. The order does not dispose of all claims and all parties. In fact, in their notice of appeal, appellants concede the summary judgment order did not dispose of all claims and all parties. By letter dated January 17, 2008, we directed appellants to file a letter brief regarding this Court's jurisdiction by January 24, 2008 or the appeal would be dismissed. Appellants responded in a letter conceding the Court does not have jurisdiction and requesting that we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

An order that does not dispose of all claims and all parties is not final. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). An appeal may be taken only from a final judgment. Id.

We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.


Summaries of

Ramirez v. Colony SQ Condo

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Feb 8, 2008
No. 05-07-01326-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 8, 2008)
Case details for

Ramirez v. Colony SQ Condo

Case Details

Full title:MARY RAMIREZ, RICARDO RAMIREZ, AND MARTHA RAMIREZ, Appellants v. COLONY…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas

Date published: Feb 8, 2008

Citations

No. 05-07-01326-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 8, 2008)