From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramirez v. Cnty. of Alameda

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 12, 2013
Case No. C12-4852-MEJ (N.D. Cal. Mar. 12, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. C12-4852-MEJ

03-12-2013

ELISA RAMIREZ, Guardian ad Litem for A.S., minor, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, ALAMEDA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT, GREGORY AHERN, Sheriff, Defendants.

JOHN L. BURRIS, Esq. (SBN 69888) DeWITT M. LACY, Esq. (SBN 258789) THE LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS Airport Corporate Center Attorneys for Plaintiff ELISA RAMIREZ, Guardian ad Litem for A.S., minor THOMAS F. BERTRAND, State Bar No. 056560 MICHAEL C. WENZEL, State Bar No. 215388 BERTRAND, FOX & ELLIOT The Waterfront Building Attorneys for Defendants COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, ALAMEDA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and GREGORY AHERN


JOHN L. BURRIS, Esq. (SBN 69888)
DeWITT M. LACY, Esq. (SBN 258789)
THE LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS
Airport Corporate Center
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ELISA RAMIREZ, Guardian ad Litem for A.S., minor
THOMAS F. BERTRAND, State Bar No. 056560
MICHAEL C. WENZEL, State Bar No. 215388
BERTRAND, FOX & ELLIOT
The Waterfront Building
Attorneys for Defendants
COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, ALAMEDA COUNTY
SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and GREGORY AHERN

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CONTINUING MEDIATION COMPLIANCE

DATE


Hon. Maria-Elena James

STIPULATION

Defendants COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, ALAMEDA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, and GREGORY AHERN, sheriff, and Plaintiff ELISA RAMIREZ, Guardian ad Litem for A.S., a minor by and through their respective attorneys of record, hereby stipulate as follows:

1. The parties' initial Case Management Conference was scheduled for December 13, 2012. Pursuant to the Court's Case Management Order issued on December 10, 2012, the Case Management Conference was vacated and the following discovery and dispositive motion deadlines were set:

(A) Disclosure of Expert Witnesses and Expert Reports to be served by 9/13/2012;
(B) Disclosure of Rebuttal Expert Witnesses to be served by 9/23/2013;
(C) Non-Expert Discovery to be completed by 10/8/2013;
(D) All Dispositive Motions shall be filed, served, and noticed by 11/7/2013; and
(E) The Court shall hear dispositive motions no later than 12/12/2013.

2. By Order dated December 6, 2012, the parties were ordered to complete mediation within 120 days from the date of the order. The last day to complete mediation is therefore April 5, 2013.

3. On January 8, 2013, the parties were assigned to H. Jay Folberg for mediation.

4. At this time, Defendants are unable to meaningfully participate in mediation by April 5, 2013 for the following reasons:

(a) Pursuant to the Initial Case Management Order and ADR Deadlines, Plaintiff's initial disclosures were due on December 6, 2012. Plaintiff did not serve their initial disclosures until January 8, 2013, thereby delaying initial discovery necessary for mediation.

(b) Additionally, Defendants propounded written discovery on Plaintiff on January 15, 2013. Responses to the written discovery were due February 19, 2013. Defendants sent meet and confer correspondence on February 26, 2013, explaining that no responses were received by that date. Defendants extended Plaintiff's responsive deadline to March 5, 2013. To date, however, no responses have been received. Responses to the written discovery may result in the need for further discovery, including key witnesses.

(c) Plaintiff's failure to provide responses to discovery has delayed Plaintiff's deposition. Defendants cannot proceed to mediation until Plaintiff's deposition is completed.

5. For all the good cause stated above, the parties respectfully request this Court extend the deadline to complete mediation until July 4, 2013, so that the parties can complete necessary discovery.

6. The parties' request for extension of the mediation compliance deadline will not interfere with any presently scheduled dates set by the Court.

7. The parties respectfully request that the Court approve this stipulation and incorporate its terms in an Order.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS

By: _______________

DeWitt M. Lacey

Attorneys for Plaintiff

ELISA RAMIREZ, Guardian ad Litem for A.S.,

minor

BERTRAND, FOX & ELLIOT

By: _______________

Michael C. Wenzel

Attorneys for Defendants

COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, ALAMEDA

COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARMENT and

GREGORY AHERN

ORDER

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFORE, and the parties' having stipulated to same, the parties' stipulation is hereby APPROVED. The deadline for the parties to complete mediation shall be continued until July 4, 2013.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________________________

HONORABLE MARIA-ELENA JAMES

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Ramirez v. Cnty. of Alameda

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 12, 2013
Case No. C12-4852-MEJ (N.D. Cal. Mar. 12, 2013)
Case details for

Ramirez v. Cnty. of Alameda

Case Details

Full title:ELISA RAMIREZ, Guardian ad Litem for A.S., minor, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 12, 2013

Citations

Case No. C12-4852-MEJ (N.D. Cal. Mar. 12, 2013)