From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramirez v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 24, 2017
NO. CV 16-02105-JFW (KS) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 24, 2017)

Opinion

NO. CV 16-02105-JFW (KS)

03-24-2017

DENISE B. RAMIREZ, Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, all of the records herein, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report"), Defendant's Objections to the Report and Recommendation ("Objections"), and Plaintiff's Reply to defendant's Objections ("Reply"). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has conducted a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been stated.

The Court concludes that the arguments presented in the Objections do not affect or alter the analysis and conclusions set forth in the Report. //

Having completed its review, the Court accepts the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Commissioner's decision is REVERSED, the case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with the Report, and Judgment shall be entered accordingly. DATED: March 24, 2017

/s/_________

JOHN F. WALTER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Ramirez v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 24, 2017
NO. CV 16-02105-JFW (KS) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 24, 2017)
Case details for

Ramirez v. Berryhill

Case Details

Full title:DENISE B. RAMIREZ, Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 24, 2017

Citations

NO. CV 16-02105-JFW (KS) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 24, 2017)