From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramirez v. Bernhardt

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 14, 2022
2:19-CV-0845-DMC (E.D. Cal. Jun. 14, 2022)

Opinion

2:19-CV-0845-DMC

06-14-2022

DON EPIGMENIO RAMIREZ., Plaintiff, v. DAVID BERNHARDT, Defendant.


ORDER

DENNIS M. COTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action. Pending before the Court is Defendant's ex parte motion, ECF No. 34, for modification of the scheduling order for this case.

Defendant argues that modification is warranted to the extent the Court has not yet ruled on Defendant's motion for summary judgment and the current schedule requires pre-trial motions in limine to be filed on or before July 15, 2022. Defendant's motion is denied because, as explained in the Court's separate order, Defendant's motion for summary judgment has been resolved and sufficient time remains to comply with the July 15, 2022, deadline.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Ramirez v. Bernhardt

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 14, 2022
2:19-CV-0845-DMC (E.D. Cal. Jun. 14, 2022)
Case details for

Ramirez v. Bernhardt

Case Details

Full title:DON EPIGMENIO RAMIREZ., Plaintiff, v. DAVID BERNHARDT, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 14, 2022

Citations

2:19-CV-0845-DMC (E.D. Cal. Jun. 14, 2022)