From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramic v. Bullock Enters.

Supreme Court of Michigan
Oct 3, 2023
SC 164164 (Mich. Oct. 3, 2023)

Opinion

SC 164164 COA 354374

10-03-2023

EDITA RAMIC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BULLOCK ENTERPRISES, LLC, d/b/a BRADFORD SQUARE APARTMENTS, Defendant, and FAZLIJA SALI, Plaintiff, and BRADFORD SQUARE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, Defendant-Appellee.


Macomb CC: 2019-000020-NO

Elizabeth T. Clement, Chief Justice Brian K. Zahra David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Megan K. Cavanagh Elizabeth M. Welch Kyra H. Bolden, Justices

ORDER

By order of July 1, 2022, the application for leave to appeal the February 1, 2022 judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decisions in Walker v Hela Mgt, LLC (Docket No. 163475), Kandil-Elsayed v F &E Oil, Inc (Docket No. 162907), Pinsky v Kroger Co of Mich (Docket No. 163430), and Becker v Enterprise Leasing Co of Detroit LLC (Docket No. 163702). On order of the Court, Walker having been dismissed by stipulation of the parties on December 19, 2022, Becker having been dismissed by stipulation of the parties on March 1, 2023, and Kandil-Elsayed and Pinsky having been decided on July 28, 2023,____ Mich. (2023)____, the application is again considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE Part II.C. of the judgment of the Court of Appeals and we REMAND this case to that court for reconsideration in light of Kandil-Elsayed and Pinsky. In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

We do not retain jurisdiction.


Summaries of

Ramic v. Bullock Enters.

Supreme Court of Michigan
Oct 3, 2023
SC 164164 (Mich. Oct. 3, 2023)
Case details for

Ramic v. Bullock Enters.

Case Details

Full title:EDITA RAMIC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BULLOCK ENTERPRISES, LLC, d/b/a…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Oct 3, 2023

Citations

SC 164164 (Mich. Oct. 3, 2023)