From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramey v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Sep 1, 2011
(Fed. Cir. Sep. 1, 2011)

Opinion

09-01-2011

CARLTON A. RAMEY, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent. 2011-3183


note: This order is nonprecedential.

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in case no. SF0752100735-I-1.

ON MOTION

Before LOURIE, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

Carlton A. Ramey moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and for an extension of time to file his informal brief.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. The docketing fee must be paid within 14 days from the date of filing of this order.

(2) The motion for an extension of time is granted. Ramey's brief is due within 45 days of the date of filing of this order.

FOR THE COURT

Jan Horbaly

Clerk

cc: Carlton A. Ramey

Sara B. Rearden, Esq.

s20


Summaries of

Ramey v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Sep 1, 2011
(Fed. Cir. Sep. 1, 2011)
Case details for

Ramey v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.

Case Details

Full title:CARLTON A. RAMEY, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Sep 1, 2011

Citations

(Fed. Cir. Sep. 1, 2011)