From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramey v. MacKin

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 1, 2005
1:02-cv-06287-OWW-SMS-P, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 88) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 1, 2005)

Opinion

1:02-cv-06287-OWW-SMS-P, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 88).

September 1, 2005


ORDER DISMISSING ACTION


Plaintiff, Johnny Ramey ("plaintiff"), is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On July 13, 2005, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and Recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty (30) days. On July 29, 2005, plaintiff filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed July 13, 2005, are ADOPTED IN FULL; and,

2. This action is DISMISSED in its entirety.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Ramey v. MacKin

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 1, 2005
1:02-cv-06287-OWW-SMS-P, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 88) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 1, 2005)
Case details for

Ramey v. MacKin

Case Details

Full title:JOHNNEY RAMEY, Plaintiff, v. MACKIN, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 1, 2005

Citations

1:02-cv-06287-OWW-SMS-P, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 88) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 1, 2005)

Citing Cases

Ramey v. Franco

The magistrate judge also recommended denying several alternate grounds for dismissal. (ECF No. 29 at 76-77.)…