From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramey v. Cnty. of Boulder

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Dec 7, 2011
Civil Action No. 10-cv-02672-WYD-MEH (D. Colo. Dec. 7, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 10-cv-02672-WYD-MEH

12-07-2011

JOSEPH RAMEY, Plaintiff, v. THE COUNTY OF BOULDER, PAT MAYNE, MARY MYERS, NANCY SALAZAR, and KIRBY STONE, Defendants.


MINUTE ORDER


Entered by Michael E. Hegarty , United States Magistrate Judge, on December 7, 2011.

Plaintiff's Second Motion to Compel [filed November 1, 2011; docket #64] is denied without prejudice. In contravention of D.C. Colo. LCivR 37.1, Plaintiff has failed to set forth in the motion, or to attach a copy of, the specific interrogatories, requests or responses to which the motion is directed. Without such information, the Court cannot determine whether such discovery has been provided (as argued by Defendants), or whether the discovery requests fall under the scope of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26.


Summaries of

Ramey v. Cnty. of Boulder

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Dec 7, 2011
Civil Action No. 10-cv-02672-WYD-MEH (D. Colo. Dec. 7, 2011)
Case details for

Ramey v. Cnty. of Boulder

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH RAMEY, Plaintiff, v. THE COUNTY OF BOULDER, PAT MAYNE, MARY MYERS…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Dec 7, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 10-cv-02672-WYD-MEH (D. Colo. Dec. 7, 2011)