From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rambo v. Hall, Secretary of State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Jan 31, 1938
112 S.W.2d 951 (Ark. 1938)

Summary

In Rambo v. Hall, 195 Ark. 502, 112 S.W.2d 952 (1938), a petitioner sought to restrain the secretary of state from certifying a petition because the ballot title of a proposed bill to be submitted to a vote of the people was insufficient.

Summary of this case from Finn v. McCuen

Opinion

No. 4-5025

Opinion delivered January 31, 1938.

ACTION — PREMATURELY BROUGHT. — A petition to restrain the Secretary of State from certifying out to be voted on a proposed old age and blind pension bill on the ground that the proposed ballot title is insufficient alleging that part of the petition had been filed with the Secretary of State is premature, since, until the Secretary of State shall have acted upon the sufficiency of the petition, there is nothing for the court to review.

An original proceeding.

A. L. Rotenberry, for petitioners.

Jack Holt, Attorney General, for respondent.


Petitioner alleges that a part of a petition has been filed with the Secretary of State. It appears that the petition referred to is one to have a proposed old age and blind pension bill submitted to a vote of the people of Arkansas at the next general election November 8, 1938.

There is attached to the complaint a proposed ballot title, and petitioner asserts the invalidity and legal insufficiency of this ballot title and asks for a restraining order to issue against the Secretary of State.

We understand that the petitioner here questions the sufficiency of proceedings arising under amendment No. 7 to the state Constitution. This action is premature for the reason that "the sufficiency of all state-wide petitions shall be decided in the first instance by the Secretary of State, subject to review by the Supreme Court of the state, which shall have original and exclusive jurisdiction over all such causes." See amendment No. 7. Until the Secretary of State shall have acted upon the sufficiency of the petition and his action therein shall have been properly challenged, we have nothing to review. We are asked to restrain the Secretary of State from performing part of his official duties.

At most, a moot question is presented. The action is dismissed.


Summaries of

Rambo v. Hall, Secretary of State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Jan 31, 1938
112 S.W.2d 951 (Ark. 1938)

In Rambo v. Hall, 195 Ark. 502, 112 S.W.2d 952 (1938), a petitioner sought to restrain the secretary of state from certifying a petition because the ballot title of a proposed bill to be submitted to a vote of the people was insufficient.

Summary of this case from Finn v. McCuen
Case details for

Rambo v. Hall, Secretary of State

Case Details

Full title:RAMBO v. HALL, SECRETARY OF STATE

Court:Supreme Court of Arkansas

Date published: Jan 31, 1938

Citations

112 S.W.2d 951 (Ark. 1938)
112 S.W.2d 951

Citing Cases

Finn v. McCuen

c. The cases In Rambo v. Hall, 195 Ark. 502, 112 S.W.2d 952 (1938), a petitioner sought to restrain the…

Ward v. Priest

Under Amendment 7 as it was originally passed by the voters, there was nothing this court could do with…