From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rambert v. Wetzel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA PITTSBURGH
Feb 9, 2018
Civil Action No. 18-38 (W.D. Pa. Feb. 9, 2018)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 18-38

02-09-2018

ERIC X. RAMBERT, Plaintiff, v. JOHN E. WETZEL, SECRETARY; SHEILA MOORE-SMEAL, DEPUTY SECRETARY; SCOTT A. NICHALSON, DEPUTY WARDEN; W. TIFT, CO IV; S. DOE, CO V; ART LNU, UNIT MANAGER; ANKRON, UNIT COUNSELOR; SGT. HAINES, C.O. 1 MILLER, JOHN DOE, C.O. 1; AND NEDRA GREGO, CORRECTIONS HEALTH CARE ADMIN.; Defendants.



Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan MEMORANDUM ORDER

Plaintiff Eric X. Rambert initiated this action on January 9, 2018 by submission of a civil rights complaint and a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP"), (Docket No. 1), and the case was assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan for review in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Local Rules of Court 72.C and 72.D.

On January 19, 2018, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation wherein she recommended Plaintiff's IFP motion be denied in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). (Docket No. 2). The Magistrate Judge determined that Plaintiff had incurred three or more "strikes," and, therefore, pursuant to the dictates of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), he cannot proceed in forma papueris. She also determined that Plaintiff had not met the threshold showing of imminent danger of serious physical injury in order to avail himself of the "imminent danger" exception to § 1915(g). It was therefore recommended that this action be dismissed without prejudice and reopened when Plaintiff paid the full $400.00 filing fee. Id. Plaintiff was informed that he had until February 5, 2018 to file objections to the Report and Recommendation, but, as of today, no objections have been filed. Therefore, upon an independent review of the record and consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, the following Order is entered.

AND NOW, this 9th day of February, 2018,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's IFP motion (ECF No. 1) is hereby denied in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is dismissed without prejudice to Plaintiff's right to reopen it by paying the full $400.00 filing fee.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 2) is adopted as the Opinion of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this case CLOSED.

AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Plaintiff has thirty (30) days to file a notice of appeal as provided by Rule 3 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

/s/ Nora Barry Fischer

Nora Barry Fischer

United States District Judge cc: Eric X. Rambert

AM-9223

SCI Fayette

PO Box 9999

Labelle, PA 15450


Summaries of

Rambert v. Wetzel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA PITTSBURGH
Feb 9, 2018
Civil Action No. 18-38 (W.D. Pa. Feb. 9, 2018)
Case details for

Rambert v. Wetzel

Case Details

Full title:ERIC X. RAMBERT, Plaintiff, v. JOHN E. WETZEL, SECRETARY; SHEILA…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA PITTSBURGH

Date published: Feb 9, 2018

Citations

Civil Action No. 18-38 (W.D. Pa. Feb. 9, 2018)

Citing Cases

Rambert v. Krasner

The Court also observed that the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania has…