From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramales v. Teigen

United States District Court, Central District of California
Aug 14, 2024
CV 23-7312 FMO (Ex) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 14, 2024)

Opinion

CV 23-7312 FMO (Ex)

08-14-2024

ULICES RAMALES, Plaintiff, v. CHRISSY TEIGEN, Defendant.


ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE

FERNANDO M. OLGUIN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Having been advised by counsel that the above-entitled action has been settled, (Dkt. 40, Notice of Setlement), IT IS ORDERED that the above-captioned action is hereby dismissed without costs and without prejudice to the right, upon good cause shown by no later than 45 days, to re-open the action if settlement is not consummated. The court retains full jurisdiction over this action and this Order shall not prejudice any party to this action. Failure to re-open or seek an extension of time to re-open the action by the deadline set forth above shall be deemed as consent by the parties to dismissal of the action without prejudice. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b); Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-30, 82 S.Ct. 1386, 1388 (1962).


Summaries of

Ramales v. Teigen

United States District Court, Central District of California
Aug 14, 2024
CV 23-7312 FMO (Ex) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 14, 2024)
Case details for

Ramales v. Teigen

Case Details

Full title:ULICES RAMALES, Plaintiff, v. CHRISSY TEIGEN, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Aug 14, 2024

Citations

CV 23-7312 FMO (Ex) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 14, 2024)