From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramadan v. City of Napa

United States District Court, N.D. California
May 30, 2007
No. C 06-01804 MHP (N.D. Cal. May. 30, 2007)

Opinion

No. C 06-01804 MHP.

May 30, 2007


ORDER


At the May 21, 2007 hearing, the court announced its intention to order the parties to refrain from certain conduct that would interfere with the resolution of the instant action. The parties, unable to agree upon the scope of the order, submitted proposed orders to the court.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that

1) Plaintiff Turan Ramadan is henceforth prohibited from initiating or engaging in any discussion of the instant action with defendants or their employees in the workplace.

2) Defendants City of Napa, Phil Brun and Michael O'Bryon shall not investigate any future claims brought against Turan Ramadan related to this suit except:

a) Defendants are permitted to complete any pending investigations against Turan Ramadan. Should any pending investigation result in the issuance of a Notice of Intent to discipline, then any further proceedings are stayed until the resolution of defendant's motion for summary judgment. No hearing or disciplinary action shall take place until the court has issued its order on the summary judgment motion.

b) Defendants may investigate any future claims brought against Turan Ramadan unrelated to the instant action. Defendants are directed to bring to these matters to the court's attention for further proceedings consistent with this order.

3) Defendants are further prohibited from initiating or engaging in any discussion of the instant action with Turan Ramadan in the workplace except through formal discovery or in connection with the pending investigations as outlined above.

Any party in violation of the court's order will be deemed in contempt of court.


Summaries of

Ramadan v. City of Napa

United States District Court, N.D. California
May 30, 2007
No. C 06-01804 MHP (N.D. Cal. May. 30, 2007)
Case details for

Ramadan v. City of Napa

Case Details

Full title:TURAN RAMADAN AND PATRICIA RAMADAN, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF NAPA, PHIL…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: May 30, 2007

Citations

No. C 06-01804 MHP (N.D. Cal. May. 30, 2007)

Citing Cases

Williams v. Williams

On its own, temporal proximity between a protected activity and an alleged act of retaliation is typically…

Lehane v. the Boeing Co.

" [A]n employer's action [must] rise to the level of tangible harm [in order to] separate[ ] significant from…