From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

R.A.M., Inc. v. Bailey

Supreme Court of Florida
Apr 30, 1969
222 So. 2d 2 (Fla. 1969)

Opinion

No. 38225.

April 30, 1969.

Writ of Certiorari to the Florida Industrial Commission.

B.C. Pyle, of Whittaker, Pyle Wood, Orlando, for petitioners.

Irvin A. Meyers, of Meyers, Mooney Langston, Orlando, Patrick H. Mears and J. Franklin Garner, Tallahassee, for respondents.


By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date December 24, 1968.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

Attorneys for respondent, Bailey, are awarded a fee of $250.00 for services in this Court.

It is so ordered.

ERVIN, C.J., and ROBERTS, DREW, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

R.A.M., Inc. v. Bailey

Supreme Court of Florida
Apr 30, 1969
222 So. 2d 2 (Fla. 1969)
Case details for

R.A.M., Inc. v. Bailey

Case Details

Full title:R.A.M., INC. AND HARTFORD ACCIDENT INDEMNITY COMPANY, PETITIONERS, v…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Apr 30, 1969

Citations

222 So. 2d 2 (Fla. 1969)