From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ralston v. Simon

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION
Mar 19, 2019
CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:18cv93 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 19, 2019)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:18cv93

03-19-2019

SEAN D. RALSTON v. MATTHEW SIMON


ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff Sean D. Ralston, proceeding pro se, filed the above-styled lawsuit. The Court previously referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, for consideration pursuant to applicable orders of this court.

Plaintiff has filed a motion seeking a preliminary injunction or temporary restraining order (doc. no. 3). The Magistrate Judge has submitted a Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge recommending the motion be denied.

The Court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, along with the record and pleadings. No objections were filed to the Report and Recommendation.

ORDER

Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct and the report of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. The motion for preliminary injunction or temporary restraining order is DENIED.

So ORDERED and SIGNED March 19, 2019.

/s/_________

Ron Clark, Senior District Judge


Summaries of

Ralston v. Simon

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION
Mar 19, 2019
CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:18cv93 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 19, 2019)
Case details for

Ralston v. Simon

Case Details

Full title:SEAN D. RALSTON v. MATTHEW SIMON

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 19, 2019

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:18cv93 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 19, 2019)