Opinion
Civil Action 19-1539
08-24-2022
MATTHEW RALSTON v. MITCHELL GARABEDIAN, ESQ., KURTIS N. POULOS, MITCHELL GARABEDIAN LAW OFFICE
ORDER
KEARNEY, J.
AND NOW, this 24th day of August 2022, upon considering Plaintiffs amended Motion for substitution (ECF Doc. No. 432), confirming service upon the nonparty sought to be substituted (ECF Doc. No. 433), and finding Plaintiff has not met his burden of securing a personal representative consistent with Pennsylvania law as more fully detailed in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED:
1. Plaintiffs amended Motion for substitution (ECF Doc. No. 432) is DENIED without prejudice; and, 2. We grant Plaintiff leave, by September 9, 2022, to either: move for an extension of time to move for substitution of a personal representative; or, absent a timely motion for an extension, show cause in a memorandum not exceeding ten pages as to why we should not dismiss his claims against the deceased Kurtis Poulos.