Opinion
May, 1934.
Order entered May 9, 1934, amended so as to state that the order is affirmed on the law for insufficiency in law of the proposed supplemental answer and not as a matter of discretion. [See ante, p. 907.]
May, 1934.
Order entered May 9, 1934, amended so as to state that the order is affirmed on the law for insufficiency in law of the proposed supplemental answer and not as a matter of discretion. [See ante, p. 907.]
Full title:EDNA A. RALPH, Respondent, v. EDITH S. CRONK, as Administratrix, etc., of…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Date published: May 1, 1934