From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ralli v. Hillyer

City Court of New York — General Term
Oct 1, 1895
15 Misc. 692 (N.Y. Misc. 1895)

Opinion

October, 1895.

Wm. C. Beecher, for appellant.

Charles Wehle, for respondents.


Appeal from a judgment sustaining a demurrer.

The case of Knorr v. Bates, 33 N.Y.S. 691, is an authority on the question presented by the demurrer and binding upon this court, notwithstanding the more liberal view taken by Judge INGRAHAM in Leitner v. Beecher.

Demurrer sustained, with costs.

FITZSIMONS, J., concurs.

Order affirmed, with costs.


Summaries of

Ralli v. Hillyer

City Court of New York — General Term
Oct 1, 1895
15 Misc. 692 (N.Y. Misc. 1895)
Case details for

Ralli v. Hillyer

Case Details

Full title:PANDIA C. RALLI et al., Respondents, v . GEORGE R. HILLYER, Appellant

Court:City Court of New York — General Term

Date published: Oct 1, 1895

Citations

15 Misc. 692 (N.Y. Misc. 1895)

Citing Cases

Stieglitz v. Belding

The demurrer was properly sustained. Knoor v. Bates, 12 Misc. Rep. 396; 14 id. 501; Ralli v. Hillyer, 15 id.…

Lawrence v. Schaefer

In that case the clause was held to be invalid. This has been followed in the City Court of New York. (See…