Opinion
April 23, 1996
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (James Gowan, J.).
While we agree with plaintiff that the writings he adduces satisfy the Statute of Frauds ( see, Fox Co. v. Kaufman Org., 74 N.Y.2d 136), we nevertheless affirm on the ground that the contract in issue is illegal, in that it involves a prospective splitting of fees in the operation of an accounting practice without the clients being informed in contravention of the Rules of the Board of Regents ( 8 NYCRR 29.1 [b] [3]; 29.10 [a] [2]; [b]; see, Hartman v. Bell, 137 A.D.2d 585; Sachs v. Saloshin, 138 A.D.2d 586).
Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Wallach, Rubin, Kupferman and Tom, JJ.