From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rakofsky v. Mercedes-Benz U.S., LLC

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Mar 15, 2024
22-cv-04427-EJD (N.D. Cal. Mar. 15, 2024)

Opinion

22-cv-04427-EJD

03-15-2024

JOSEPH RAKOFSKY, Plaintiff, v. MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLC, et al., Defendants.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

EDWARD J. DAVILA, United States District Judge

On July 29, 2022, Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC (“MBUSA”) removed this case from Monterey County Superior Court. ECF 1. On August 2, 2022, the parties were ordered to show cause why the case should not be remanded. ECF No. 7 (“OSC”). Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC (“MBUSA”) responded to the OSC on August 8, 2022. ECF No. 10.

MBUSA represented that Defendants Wienik Bleyenberg and Devon Thompson, at the time this action was commenced, were both citizens of the State of California. See ECF No. 1 at 3; ECF No. 10 at 3. Accordingly, it appears removal was not proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1441(b)(2).

Additionally, it is not apparent that the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000 as required under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. See Conrad Assocs. v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co., 994 F.Supp. 1196, 1198 (N.D. Cal. 1998) (“A speculative argument regarding the potential value of the award is insufficient” to establish the amount in controversy).

THE COURT hereby ORDERS MBUSA to show cause by March 21, 2024, why this case should not be remanded in light of the above. MBUSA is permitted to submit a five-page response.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Rakofsky v. Mercedes-Benz U.S., LLC

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Mar 15, 2024
22-cv-04427-EJD (N.D. Cal. Mar. 15, 2024)
Case details for

Rakofsky v. Mercedes-Benz U.S., LLC

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH RAKOFSKY, Plaintiff, v. MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLC, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Mar 15, 2024

Citations

22-cv-04427-EJD (N.D. Cal. Mar. 15, 2024)