From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rakip v. Paradise Awnings Corp.

United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
May 2, 2022
10-20004-Civ-COOKE/GOODMAN (S.D. Fla. May. 2, 2022)

Opinion

10-20004-Civ-COOKE/GOODMAN

05-02-2022

WILLIAM RAKIP, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. PARADISE AWNINGS CORPORATION, et al., Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs., and CESAR JERONIMO, Plaintiff,


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

MARCIA G. COOKE, United States District Judge.

THIS MATTER is before me upon the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of the Honorable Jonathan Goodman, U.S. Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 351).

In his R&R, Judge Goodman recommends granting in part and denying in part Defendants' Motion to Tax Costs (ECF No. 244) and Defendants' Supplemental Bill of Costs (ECF Nos. 349 and 350). The parties have not filed Objections to the R&R, and the time to do so has passed.

I have reviewed the Motions, the briefing and accompanying exhibits, Judge Goodman's R&R, the record, and the relevant legal authorities.

Accordingly, Judge Goodman's R&R (ECF No. 351) is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED as the Order of this Court.

DONE and ORDERED.

Jonathan Goodman, U.S. Magistrate Judge.


Summaries of

Rakip v. Paradise Awnings Corp.

United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
May 2, 2022
10-20004-Civ-COOKE/GOODMAN (S.D. Fla. May. 2, 2022)
Case details for

Rakip v. Paradise Awnings Corp.

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM RAKIP, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. PARADISE AWNINGS…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Florida

Date published: May 2, 2022

Citations

10-20004-Civ-COOKE/GOODMAN (S.D. Fla. May. 2, 2022)

Citing Cases

AM Crespi Miami, LLC v. Century Sur. Co.

Because Defendant's have made no effort to explain why a rush fee would be appropriate or recoverable, the…