From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rajchel v. Nygren

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS WESTERN DIVISION
Sep 6, 2011
Case No. 1:09-cv-03419 (N.D. Ill. Sep. 6, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 1:09-cv-03419

09-06-2011

SUZANNE K. RAJCHEL, and FERDINAND H. RAJCHEL, JR., Plaintiffs, v. KEITH NYGREN, SHERIFF OF MCHENRY COUNTY, ILLINOIS, in his Official Capacity, DEANNA MERRELL, personally, etc., et al., Defendants.

By: John Thomas Moran, Jr. Attorney for Plaintiffs


Judge

Magistrate Judge P. Michael

Mahoney

MOTION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT

Now the plaintiffs by counsel and move this Honorable Court for entry of final judgment. Plaintiffs sued defendants for both federal and state claims.

1. On August 5, 2011, the Court entered an order granted Defendants' motions to dismiss on Counts I and III of the Second Amended Complaint with prejudice.
2. The same order granted Defendants' motions to dismiss Count II "without prejudice to refiling within 30 days. . ." And the remaining Counts IV and V were also dismissed without prejudice to possibly refiled in state court.
3. The order also denied Plaintiffs' motion for leave to file a Third Amended Complaint.
4. Plaintiffs request that the judgment be set out promptly in a separate document as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58 (a).
5. Here, Plaintiffs inform the Court that they do not intend to file another
amended complaint or an amended Count II.
6. No further action other than to enter judgment remains for the Court. WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs respectfully move the Court to enter judgment pursuant to
Rule 58(a) in a separate document.

Respectfully submitted,

By: John Thomas Moran, Jr.

Attorney for Plaintiffs

John Thomas Moran, Jr. (#1954822)

The Moran Law Group

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned, an attorney, certifies that on September 6, 2011, he served a copy of the foregoing MOTION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT by means of electronic filing in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 5, Local Rule 5.5 and the General Order on Electronic Case Filing (ECF) XI (C), thereby causing a copy of the foregoing to be served upon all counsel of record.

By: John Thomas Moran, Jr.

Attorney for Plaintiffs.

John Thomas Moran, Jr. (#1954822)

The Moran Law Group


Summaries of

Rajchel v. Nygren

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS WESTERN DIVISION
Sep 6, 2011
Case No. 1:09-cv-03419 (N.D. Ill. Sep. 6, 2011)
Case details for

Rajchel v. Nygren

Case Details

Full title:SUZANNE K. RAJCHEL, and FERDINAND H. RAJCHEL, JR., Plaintiffs, v. KEITH…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Sep 6, 2011

Citations

Case No. 1:09-cv-03419 (N.D. Ill. Sep. 6, 2011)