From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rait P'ship, L.P. v. Nathan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Feb 14, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-CV-7146 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 14, 2012)

Summary

denying motion to remand and finding the Rooker-Feldman doctrine not applicable because the entry of a confessed judgment, on its own, is not a final judgment until the time to challenge it has passed

Summary of this case from First Commonwealth Bank v. Fresh Harvest River, LLC

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-CV-7146

02-14-2012

RAIT PARTNERSHIP, L.P. v. RICHARD J. NATHAN


ORDER

AND NOW, this 14th day of February, 2012, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the defendant's motion for relief pursuant to F.R.C.P. 59(e), 60(b)(4) and 60(b)(6) and for remand (Doc.# 25) is DENIED.

BY THE COURT:

___________________

J. WILLIAM DITTER, JR., J.


Summaries of

Rait P'ship, L.P. v. Nathan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Feb 14, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-CV-7146 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 14, 2012)

denying motion to remand and finding the Rooker-Feldman doctrine not applicable because the entry of a confessed judgment, on its own, is not a final judgment until the time to challenge it has passed

Summary of this case from First Commonwealth Bank v. Fresh Harvest River, LLC
Case details for

Rait P'ship, L.P. v. Nathan

Case Details

Full title:RAIT PARTNERSHIP, L.P. v. RICHARD J. NATHAN

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Feb 14, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-CV-7146 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 14, 2012)

Citing Cases

First Commonwealth Bank v. Fresh Harvest River, LLC

A review of the history of this case in state court reveals that the confessed judgment is not a final…

Complete Bus. Solutions Grp., Inc. v. Sunrooms Am., Inc.

Another court has decided that the action can be removed even if there is no petition pending in the state…