From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Raiser v. City of Murrieta

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 22, 2021
Case No. EDCV 19-183-DSF (KK) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 22, 2021)

Opinion

Case No. EDCV 19-183-DSF (KK)

02-22-2021

AARON RAISER, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF MURRIETA, ET AL., Defendant(s).


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Fourth Amended Complaint, the relevant records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court has engaged in de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Plaintiff has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the following claims in the Fourth Amended Complaint are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without leave to amend:

(a) Claim Four (Section 1983 Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection);

(b) Section 1983 Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection claims against defendants Jacob, Abbate, Does 3, 4, 7, and 8 set forth in Claims Fourteen, Fifteen, Sixteen and Seventeen;

(c) Claim Twenty-Two (ADA) against defendants Jacob and City of Murrieta; and
(d) all claims against Does 20-40.

The Court will issue a separate order regarding service of the remaining claims in the Fourth Amended Complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: February 22, 2021

/s/_________

Honorable Dale S. Fischer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Raiser v. City of Murrieta

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 22, 2021
Case No. EDCV 19-183-DSF (KK) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 22, 2021)
Case details for

Raiser v. City of Murrieta

Case Details

Full title:AARON RAISER, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF MURRIETA, ET AL., Defendant(s).

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 22, 2021

Citations

Case No. EDCV 19-183-DSF (KK) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 22, 2021)