From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rainwater v. McGinniss

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 5, 2011
No. CIV S-10-1727 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 5, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-1727 GGH P.

October 5, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action seeking relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 23, 2011, the undersigned issued an order resolving five of plaintiff's motions. Within one week plaintiff had already filed a new motions. On September 2, 2011, defendant filed a motion for summary judgment. Instead of filing an opposition, plaintiff filed a request for a 58 day extension due to limited access to legal resources and the law library. That request was withdrawn as the parties filed a stipulation and proposed order that plaintiff shall file his opposition by December 12, 2011. Doc. 78 The court will adopt the parties' proposed order, however plaintiff should use this time to file his opposition to summary judgment and not file seriatim motions for relief. No further extensions will be granted.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff must file an opposition to the motion for summary judgment by December 12, 2011. No further extensions will be granted.

DATED: October 4, 2011


Summaries of

Rainwater v. McGinniss

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 5, 2011
No. CIV S-10-1727 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 5, 2011)
Case details for

Rainwater v. McGinniss

Case Details

Full title:JOHN ALLEN RAINWATER, Plaintiff, v. JOHN McGINNISS, Sheriff, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 5, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-10-1727 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 5, 2011)