From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rainwater v. McGinniss

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 2, 2011
No. CIV S-10-1727 GGH P (E.D. Cal. May. 2, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-1727 GGH P.

May 2, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action seeking relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has filed a motion requesting the court to order defendant to preserve evidence from a four month period. Defendants have a standing obligation not to destroy evidence which they know, or should know, is relevant to the case. In addition, plaintiff, by his pleading, has certainly placed defendants on further notice of their obligation. However, because plaintiff has not set forth any evidence that defendants have, or plan to, destroy relevant evidence, plaintiff's motions is denied as unnecessary.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's April 14, 2011, motion (Doc. 20) is denied.


Summaries of

Rainwater v. McGinniss

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 2, 2011
No. CIV S-10-1727 GGH P (E.D. Cal. May. 2, 2011)
Case details for

Rainwater v. McGinniss

Case Details

Full title:JOHN ALLEN RAINWATER, Plaintiff, v. JOHN McGINNISS, Sheriff, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 2, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-10-1727 GGH P (E.D. Cal. May. 2, 2011)