From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rainsberger v. State

Supreme Court of Nevada
Jan 10, 1969
85 Nev. 22 (Nev. 1969)

Opinion

No. 5576

January 10, 1969

Appeal from Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Howard W. Babcock, J.

Samuel S. Lionel, of Las Vegas, for Appellant.

Harvey Dickerson, Attorney General, George E. Franklin, Jr., District Attorney, and Earl P. Gripentrog, Chief Criminal Deputy District Attorney, Clark County, for Respondent.


OPINION


Appellant contends that the warrant of execution rendered on April 9, 1968 directing death by administration of lethal gas on May 2, 1968 is invalid because the judge who signed the warrant was not the successor in office of the judge who heard the plea of guilty as required by NRS 176.495(3).

Whether the warrant was valid or not is moot. The time set for execution has passed and a new warrant will be required.

The new warrant should be drawn and signed by the judge of Department Three of the Eighth Judicial District Court in accordance with NRS 176.495(3).

COLLINS, C.J., BATJER and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rainsberger v. State

Supreme Court of Nevada
Jan 10, 1969
85 Nev. 22 (Nev. 1969)
Case details for

Rainsberger v. State

Case Details

Full title:JACK RAINSBERGER, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, RESPONDENT

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada

Date published: Jan 10, 1969

Citations

85 Nev. 22 (Nev. 1969)
449 P.2d 254

Citing Cases

Floyd v. The Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of State

a district court in Nevada for purposes of the Uniform Commercial Real Estate Receivership Act); NRS 132.116…