Upload a complaint or brief to quickly find on-point case law.
CARA A.I. uses the facts and legal issues in your document to find relevant authorities.
Drag a complaint or brief hereUpload a complaint or briefPDF documentWORD documentTXT documentOr, choose a document to uploadChoose DocumentSecure
Find on-point cases faster with CARA A.I.
§

Rains Investment Co. v. George Roe & Associates, Inc.

140 Ga. App. 566 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976)
Depth of Treatment
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newest
Cite Count
Rains Investment Co. v. George Roe & Associates, Inc.

1 Citing case

  1. Sunamerica Financial v. 260 Peachtree St.

    202 Ga. App. 790 (Ga. Ct. App. 1991)   Cited 24 times
    In Sunamerica, rather than holding that parents could not be strangers to their subsidiaries' relations as matter of law, the court gave parents a qualified privilege to intervene in their subsidiaries' business and contractual relations.

    (Second emphasis supplied.) Potts-Thompson c. Co. v. Capital City c. Co., 137 Ga. 648 (2) ( 74 S.E. 279); Rains Investment Co. v. George Roe c. Assoc., 140 Ga. App. 566, 567 ( 231 S.E.2d 460). Normally, the questions of whether an act is permanent and grave in character or whether the act was done with the requisite intent are questions of fact for the jury.