From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rainey v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia
Jan 22, 1996
465 S.E.2d 661 (Ga. 1996)

Opinion

S95G1050

DECIDED JANUARY 22, 1996

Certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Georgia — 216 Ga. App. 557.

Lenzer Lenzer, Robert W. Lenzer, Thomas P. Lenzer, Phyllis Miller, for appellant.

Daniel J. Porter, District Attorney, George F. Hutchinson III, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.


Rainey was convicted of rape and possession of cocaine following a jury trial at which direct evidence of guilt was offered during the State's case-in-chief. He did not request a jury instruction on the law of circumstantial evidence, and none was given by the trial court. His convictions were affirmed by the Court of Appeals in Rainey v. State, 216 Ga. App. 557 ( 455 S.E.2d 73) (1995). We granted certiorari because the issues presented in Rainey's petition were then pending before this Court in Stubbs v. State, 265 Ga. 883 ( 463 S.E.2d 686) (1995). We subsequently rendered our decision in Stubbs, in which we reiterated that where the State's case rests both on direct and circumstantial evidence, a jury instruction on circumstantial evidence is required to be given only upon request. Since Rainey failed to request a charge on the law of circumstantial evidence as set out in OCGA § 24-4-6, the judgment of the Court of Appeals must be affirmed. Stubbs, supra.

Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur, except Fletcher, P. J., who concurs in the judgment only.


DECIDED JANUARY 22, 1996.


Summaries of

Rainey v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia
Jan 22, 1996
465 S.E.2d 661 (Ga. 1996)
Case details for

Rainey v. State

Case Details

Full title:RAINEY v. THE STATE

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: Jan 22, 1996

Citations

465 S.E.2d 661 (Ga. 1996)
266 Ga. 163

Citing Cases

Carter v. State

Conversely, when the State's evidence depends on both direct and circumstantial evidence, in the absence of a…