From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rainey v. Richard

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jul 17, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-01434-CMA-MEH (D. Colo. Jul. 17, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-cv-01434-CMA-MEH

07-17-2012

JOHN RAINEY, Plaintiff, v. RICHARD, Defendant.


MINUTE ORDER

Entered by Michael E. Hegarty , United States Magistrate Judge, on July 17, 2012.

Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint [filed July 16, 2012; docket #21] is denied as moot. As explained in this Court's June 25, 2012 order, the Plaintiff may file an Amended Complaint once as a matter of course (i.e., without seeking permission from the Court ) either before or within 21 days after the Defendant files an answer or motion pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a). Here, the Plaintiff has not yet filed an amended pleading and the Defendant has not yet filed an answer or other response to the operative Complaint.

The Clerk of the Court is directed to provide to the Plaintiff a copy of the proper "complaint" form to be used in prisoner proceedings with the mailing of this order.


Summaries of

Rainey v. Richard

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jul 17, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-01434-CMA-MEH (D. Colo. Jul. 17, 2012)
Case details for

Rainey v. Richard

Case Details

Full title:JOHN RAINEY, Plaintiff, v. RICHARD, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Jul 17, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-cv-01434-CMA-MEH (D. Colo. Jul. 17, 2012)