From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rainey v. Huertas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Oct 26, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-01434-CMA-MEH (D. Colo. Oct. 26, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-cv-01434-CMA-MEH

10-26-2012

JOHN RAINEY, Plaintiff, v. HECTOR T. HUERTAS, TRAVIS TRANI, DENNIS BURBANK, and DR. HODGE, Defendants.


MINUTE ORDER

Entered by Michael E. Hegarty , United States Magistrate Judge, on October 26, 2012.

Before the Court is Plaintiff's "Motion to Consolidate Preliminary Injunction" [filed October 25, 2012; docket #99]. Plaintiff appears to seek consolidation of the original and amended complaints in this case; however, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure do not provide such relief. Rather, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15, if the Plaintiff seeks to add or join a party to the operative Amended Complaint (docket #37), the Plaintiff must move for leave to file an amended complaint and attached a proposed amended complaint to his motion. Consequently, the present motion is denied.


Summaries of

Rainey v. Huertas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Oct 26, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-01434-CMA-MEH (D. Colo. Oct. 26, 2012)
Case details for

Rainey v. Huertas

Case Details

Full title:JOHN RAINEY, Plaintiff, v. HECTOR T. HUERTAS, TRAVIS TRANI, DENNIS…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Oct 26, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-cv-01434-CMA-MEH (D. Colo. Oct. 26, 2012)