Summary
In Matheson v. Railroad, 61 Kan. 667, the same result was reached in regard to the Missouri statute; and the statute of the same import of New Mexico was refused enforcement in Dale v. Railroad, 57 Kan. 601. It should be noted that these statutes differ materially from the Massachusetts statute in providing for the fixed sum of five thousand dollars as a forfeiture in all cases; the ides of compensation measured by any other rule seems to be excluded.
Summary of this case from Hill v. RailroadOpinion
No. 10254-8-III.
June 26, 1990. UNREPORTED OPINION
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Benton County, No. 86-2-00950-4, Carolyn A. Brown, J., entered August 31, 1989.
Affirmed by unpublished opinion per Green, J., concurred in by Munson, C.J., and Cole, J. Pro Tem.