From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Raines v. McKee

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Feb 26, 2014
Case No. 1:12CV767 (W.D. Mich. Feb. 26, 2014)

Summary

In McKee v. Raines, 10 Wall. 22, the removal, which was held to be unlawful, was made under the supposed authority of the act of March 3d 1863, and that of April 9th, 1866.

Summary of this case from Feibelman v. Packard

Opinion

Case No. 1:12CV767

02-26-2014

GERMAINE SHONTE RAINES #221947, Petitioner, v. KENNETH T. MCKEE, Respondent.


Hon. Robert J. Jonker


ORDER

APPROVING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation filed by the United States Magistrate Judge in this action. The Report and Recommendation was duly served on the parties on February 3, 2014. No objections have been filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C).

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, filed February 3, 2014, is approved and adopted as the opinion of the court.

IT IS ORDERED that Respondent's Motion for Summary Judgment (docket #7) is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED. See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473 (2000).

___________________

ROBERT J. JONKER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Raines v. McKee

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Feb 26, 2014
Case No. 1:12CV767 (W.D. Mich. Feb. 26, 2014)

In McKee v. Raines, 10 Wall. 22, the removal, which was held to be unlawful, was made under the supposed authority of the act of March 3d 1863, and that of April 9th, 1866.

Summary of this case from Feibelman v. Packard
Case details for

Raines v. McKee

Case Details

Full title:GERMAINE SHONTE RAINES #221947, Petitioner, v. KENNETH T. MCKEE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Feb 26, 2014

Citations

Case No. 1:12CV767 (W.D. Mich. Feb. 26, 2014)

Citing Cases

Feibelman v. Packard

The counsel for plaintiff in error assumes in argument that the suit was to recover damages for alleged…