Opinion
No. 2012–1973 K C.
12-17-2014
RAINBOW SUPPLY OF NY, INC. as Assignee of John Perry, Respondent, v. GEICO GENERAL INS. CO., Appellant.
Opinion
Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Wavny Toussaint, J.), entered March 16, 2012. The order, insofar as appealed from, upon denying plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, made, in effect, CPLR 3212(g) findings in plaintiff's favor, and denied defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
ORDERED that the order, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed, with $25 costs.
In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff moved for summary judgment, and defendant cross-moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that it had timely and properly denied the claims at issue based on a lack of medical necessity. Insofar as is relevant to this appeal, the Civil Court, upon denying plaintiff's motion, made, in effect, CPLR 3212(g) findings in plaintiff's favor, denied defendant's cross motion, and held that the only remaining issue for trial was medical necessity.
We find that defendant has failed to articulate a sufficient basis to strike the Civil Court's implicit CPLR 3212(g) findings in plaintiff's favor (see EMC Health Prods., Inc. v. Geico Ins. Co., 43 Misc.3d 139[A], 2014 N.Y. Slip Op 50786[U] [App Term, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2014] ). Moreover, upon a review of the record, we find that there is a triable issue of fact regarding the medical necessity of the supplies at issue (see Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557 [1980] ).
Accordingly, the order, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed.
PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and SOLOMON, JJ., concur.