From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Railcar Mgmt. v. Cedar AI, Inc.

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Jan 4, 2023
C21-0437 TSZ (W.D. Wash. Jan. 4, 2023)

Opinion

C21-0437 TSZ

01-04-2023

RAILCAR MANAGEMENT, LLC, Plaintiff, v. CEDAR AI, INC.; MARIO PONTICELLO; DARIL VILHENA; and YI CHEN, Defendants, v. WABTEC CORPORATION, Third-Party Defendant.


MINUTE ORDER

The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable Thomas S. Zilly, United States District Judge.

(1) Plaintiff's unopposed motion to seal, docket no. 148, is GRANTED as follows. The unredacted version of defendant Cedar AI, Inc.'s motion to compel, docket no. 123, shall remain under seal. The publicly-available version of this motion, docket no. 120, was redacted more than was necessary, but the motion has already been decided, see Minute Order at ¶ 1 (docket no. 147), and no purpose would be served in requiring the parties to meet and confer and file a less redacted version. For future reference, however, the parties are advised that, even when certain time periods, fees, or specific terms are considered confidential, the immediately surrounding contractual language does not generally meet the “good cause” and/or “compelling reasons” standards for sealing.

(2) The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Minute Order to all counsel of record.


Summaries of

Railcar Mgmt. v. Cedar AI, Inc.

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Jan 4, 2023
C21-0437 TSZ (W.D. Wash. Jan. 4, 2023)
Case details for

Railcar Mgmt. v. Cedar AI, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:RAILCAR MANAGEMENT, LLC, Plaintiff, v. CEDAR AI, INC.; MARIO PONTICELLO…

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Jan 4, 2023

Citations

C21-0437 TSZ (W.D. Wash. Jan. 4, 2023)