From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Raidle Cook Ins. v. Am. St. Ins. Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Sep 29, 1983
437 So. 2d 184 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Opinion

No. 82-1721.

August 17, 1983. Rehearing Denied September 29, 1983.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Palm Beach County, Vaughn J. Rudnick, J.

Roy W. Jordan, Jr., West Palm Beach, for appellants.

John J. Bulfin of Wiederhold, Moses Bulfin, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellee American States Ins. Co.


Reversed and remanded for a new trial on all issues. Upon review of the record we believe it was error for the trial court to recall the jury after discharge and conduct further proceedings to determine the jury's intent. Cf. Fitzell v. Rama Industries, Inc., 416 So.2d 1246 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982). Upon remand the parties should be given an opportunity to amend their pleadings to clarify the issues involved before a new trial is conducted.

ANSTEAD, C.J., and BERANEK and HURLEY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Raidle Cook Ins. v. Am. St. Ins. Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Sep 29, 1983
437 So. 2d 184 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)
Case details for

Raidle Cook Ins. v. Am. St. Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:RAIDLE COOK INSURANCE, INC. AND EMPLOYERS REINSURANCE CORP., APPELLANTS…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Sep 29, 1983

Citations

437 So. 2d 184 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Citing Cases

Cedars of Lebanon Hosp. v. Silva

It is, of course, a well-settled proposition that jurors may be examined only upon matters "extrinsic to the…