From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Raia v. Goldberg

Supreme Court of Alabama
Mar 25, 1948
34 So. 2d 625 (Ala. 1948)

Opinion

6 Div. 708.

March 25, 1948.

Chas. W. Greer, of Birmingham, for petitioner.

Silberman Silberman and Victor H. Smith, all of Birmingham, opposed.

Petition of Angelo Raia for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that Court in the case of Raia v. Goldberg, 34 So.2d 620.


The only points presented for review relate to the sufficiency of the complaint against the defendant's demurrer and the right of the plaintiff to recover interest on the alleged unpaid installments. The question of the effect of the defendant's discharge in bankruptcy wherein the plaintiff was listed as a creditor is not presented and, as to that, we express no opinion.

As to the other questions, we are of opinion that, they are properly disposed of by the Court of Appeals and that the writ of certiorari is due to be denied and the petition therefor dismissed.

Certiorari denied and petition dismissed.

GARDNER, C. J., and LIVINGSTON and SIMPSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Raia v. Goldberg

Supreme Court of Alabama
Mar 25, 1948
34 So. 2d 625 (Ala. 1948)
Case details for

Raia v. Goldberg

Case Details

Full title:Angelo RAIA v. David GOLDBERG

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Mar 25, 1948

Citations

34 So. 2d 625 (Ala. 1948)
34 So. 2d 625

Citing Cases

Strange v. Miller

Starnes Starnes, Guntersville, for appellee. If there was error in the matter of variance between pleading…

Selma Compress Company v. Parker

In the absence of a sworn plea, the introduction of the note in evidence made out a prima facie case for…