From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rahn v. Cohen

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Aug 2, 2000
762 So. 2d 1063 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. 4D99-2026.

Opinion filed August 2, 2000. JULY TERM 2000

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; W. Herbert Moriarty, Judge; L.T. No. 96-11990 CACE 18.

James W. Stroup of James W. Stroup, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Michael T. Moore of Holland Knight LLP, Miami, for Appellees-Ronald R. Cohen, individually, and Coconut Holdings, Ltd., a corporation.


Appellant, H. Joel Rahn, appeals from a jury verdict finding him liable to appellees, Ronald Cohen and Coconut Holdings, Inc., for breach of contract and fraud in the inducement. Appellant raises five points on appeal and we affirm on all five. Appellant contends there can be no breach of contract because there was no privity. We find it unnecessary to reach appellant's privity issue because there was sufficient evidence to support a finding of liability for fraud in the inducement and the verdict for damages awarded to appellees did not differentiate between the claim for breach of contract and the claim for fraud in the inducement.

We also find that the economic loss rule does not preclude recovery for the tort of fraud in the inducement because it is independent of the contractual breach. See HTP, Ltd. v. Lineas Aereas Costarricenses, S.A., 685 So.2d 1238 (Fla. 1996).

AFFIRMED.

WARNER, C.J., HAZOURI, J., and BARKDULL, THOMAS H., III, Associate Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Rahn v. Cohen

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Aug 2, 2000
762 So. 2d 1063 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Rahn v. Cohen

Case Details

Full title:JOEL RAHN, Appellant v. RONALD R. COHEN, individually, and COCONUT…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Aug 2, 2000

Citations

762 So. 2d 1063 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)