From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rahman v. Pierantoni

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Nov 14, 2022
3:22-CV-1253 (M.D. Pa. Nov. 14, 2022)

Opinion

3:22-CV-1253

11-14-2022

FARIDA B. RAHMAN, Plaintiff, v. FREDA. PIERANTONI, Judge, Defendant.


ORDER

Robert D. Mariani, United States District Court Judge

AND NOW, THIS 14th DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2022, upon de novo review of Magistrate Judge Joseph Saporito's Report & Recommendation (“R&R”) (Doc. 6), Plaintiff's Objections thereto (Docs. 7,8), and all other relevant documents, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The R&R (Doc. 6) is ADOPTED for the reasons stated therein.

2. Plaintiff's Objections (Docs. 7, 8) are OVERRULED. 3. The above-captioned action is DISMISSED as legally frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i).

Upon review of Plaintiffs Complaint, this Court agrees with Judge Saporito that the allegations set forth therein exclusively concern judicial acts taken by Judge Pierantoni in the performance of his duties and he is therefore entitled to absolute judicial immunity. Plaintiffs Objections fail to set forth any additional allegations which alter this analysis nor has she set forth any other viable basis for this Court to reject the pending R&R.

4. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this action.


Summaries of

Rahman v. Pierantoni

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Nov 14, 2022
3:22-CV-1253 (M.D. Pa. Nov. 14, 2022)
Case details for

Rahman v. Pierantoni

Case Details

Full title:FARIDA B. RAHMAN, Plaintiff, v. FREDA. PIERANTONI, Judge, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania

Date published: Nov 14, 2022

Citations

3:22-CV-1253 (M.D. Pa. Nov. 14, 2022)