From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ragusa v. Ragusa

Florida Court of Appeals, Fourth District
Nov 24, 2021
No. 4D21-689 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Nov. 24, 2021)

Opinion

4D21-689

11-24-2021

WILLIAM P. RAGUSA, Appellant, v. VICTORIA M. RAGUSA, Appellee.

William P. Ragusa, Boynton Beach, pro se. No appearance for appellee.


Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Karen M. Miller, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2018-DR-008641-XXXX-NB.

William P. Ragusa, Boynton Beach, pro se.

No appearance for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (holding that "[w]ithout a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court's judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory," and "[w]ithout knowing the factual context, neither can an appellate court reasonably conclude that the trial judge so misconceived the law as to require reversal"); Esaw v. Esaw, 965 So.2d 1261, 1264 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) ("The most salient impediment to meaningful review of the trial court's decision is not the absence of findings, but the absence of a transcript.").

GROSS, FORST and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ragusa v. Ragusa

Florida Court of Appeals, Fourth District
Nov 24, 2021
No. 4D21-689 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Nov. 24, 2021)
Case details for

Ragusa v. Ragusa

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM P. RAGUSA, Appellant, v. VICTORIA M. RAGUSA, Appellee.

Court:Florida Court of Appeals, Fourth District

Date published: Nov 24, 2021

Citations

No. 4D21-689 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Nov. 24, 2021)