From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ragsdale v. State

Supreme Court of Florida, Division A
Mar 11, 1932
140 So. 194 (Fla. 1932)

Opinion

Decision filed March 11, 1932.

A writ of error to the Criminal Court of Record, Orange County; W. M. Murphy, Judge.

J. J. Murray, for Plaintiff in Error;

Cary D. Landis, Attorney General, and Roy Campbell, Assistant, for the State.


This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

BUFORD, C.J., AND ELLIS AND BROWN, J.J., concur.


Summaries of

Ragsdale v. State

Supreme Court of Florida, Division A
Mar 11, 1932
140 So. 194 (Fla. 1932)
Case details for

Ragsdale v. State

Case Details

Full title:SAM RAGSDALE, Plaintiff in Error, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Defendant in Error

Court:Supreme Court of Florida, Division A

Date published: Mar 11, 1932

Citations

140 So. 194 (Fla. 1932)
140 So. 194