From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ragsdale v. Lopez-Flores

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jun 6, 2016
Case No. CV 14-8075-ODW(GJS) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 6, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. CV 14-8075-ODW(GJS)

06-06-2016

LARRY RAGSDALE, Plaintiff v. CESAR LOPEZ-FLORES, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Plaintiff on March 1, 2016 [Dkt. 42, the "Motion"], Defendants' Opposition to the Motion, all pleadings, motions, and other documents filed in this action, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed on May 3, 2016 (Dkt. 56, the "Report"). The deadline to file Objections to the Report has passed, and no Objections have been filed with the Court.

The Court accepts the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED. DATE: June 6, 2016

/s/_________

OTIS D. WRIGHT II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Ragsdale v. Lopez-Flores

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jun 6, 2016
Case No. CV 14-8075-ODW(GJS) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 6, 2016)
Case details for

Ragsdale v. Lopez-Flores

Case Details

Full title:LARRY RAGSDALE, Plaintiff v. CESAR LOPEZ-FLORES, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jun 6, 2016

Citations

Case No. CV 14-8075-ODW(GJS) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 6, 2016)