From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ragozine v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Oct 21, 2021
No. 9329-21 (U.S.T.C. Oct. 21, 2021)

Opinion

9329-21

10-21-2021

Frank Ragozine & Frances Ragozine Petitioners v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Respondent


ORDER

Maurice B. Foley Chief Judge

On September 9, 2021, respondent filed a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. Respondent asserts in his motion that this case should be dismissed on the ground that the notice of deficiency on which this case is based is invalid because petitioners paid their tax liability for 2018 before issuance of the notice.

Upon due consideration, it is

ORDERED that, on or before November 12, 2021, petitioner shall file an Objection, if any, to respondent's above-described motion and state therein the reason for the objection. Failure to file an objection may result in the granting of respondent's motion and dismissal of this case for lack of jurisdiction.


Summaries of

Ragozine v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Oct 21, 2021
No. 9329-21 (U.S.T.C. Oct. 21, 2021)
Case details for

Ragozine v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:Frank Ragozine & Frances Ragozine Petitioners v. Commissioner of Internal…

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Oct 21, 2021

Citations

No. 9329-21 (U.S.T.C. Oct. 21, 2021)