Rago v. Trifecta Techs.

Full title: JOHN RAGO, Plaintiff, v. TRIFECTA TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., Defendants.

Court: United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jul 25, 2022

Civil 5:22-cv-01482-JMG (E.D. Pa. Jul. 25, 2022)

Opinion

Civil 5:22-cv-01482-JMG

07-25-2022

JOHN RAGO, Plaintiff, v. TRIFECTA TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., Defendants.

JOHN M. GALLAGHER United States District Court Judge.

ORDER

JOHN M. GALLAGHER United States District Court Judge.

AND NOW, this 25^th day of July, 2022, after careful consideration of Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 7), Defendants' response thereto (ECF No. 8), and for the reasons provided in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion (ECF No. 7) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows:

1. Count II of Defendants' Counterclaim (ECF No. 5) is DISMISSED without prejudice.

2. Within twenty (20) days of the date of this Order, Defendants may, consistent with the Memorandum Opinion, file an amended pleading reasserting their counterclaims with additional factual allegations to support Count II. If Defendants fail to timely file an amended pleading, the case will proceed on Count I of the Counterclaim.