From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rago v. City of El Paso

Court of Appeals of Texas, Eighth District, El Paso
Nov 1, 2024
No. 08-24-00328-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 1, 2024)

Opinion

08-24-00328-CV

11-01-2024

JEFFREY RAGO AND CHRISTINE RAGO, Appellants, v. CITY OF EL PASO, Appellee.


Appeal from the 210th District Court of El Paso County, Texas (TC# 2016DTX0838)

Before Alley, C.J., Palafox and Soto, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The clerk's record was filed on October 30, 2024 in the above-styled and numbered cause. After further review, the notice of appeal is late, but it was filed within fifteen days after the deadline for the notice of appeal to be filed. A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when an appellant, acting in good faith, files a notice of appeal beyond the time allowed by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.1 but within the fifteen-day grace period provided by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion for extension of time. See Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). However, an appellant must still provide the Court with a reasonable explanation for the late filing of the notice of appeal before the Court may accept the appeal. Accordingly, Appellants are ordered to respond in writing and provide the Court with a reasonable explanation for filing the notice of appeal late. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.5(b)(1)(C), 26.3; Verburgt, 959 S.W.2d at 617. The explanation is due to be filed no later than November 11, 2024. If Appellants fail to comply with this order, the appeal is subject to dismissal without further notice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Rago v. City of El Paso

Court of Appeals of Texas, Eighth District, El Paso
Nov 1, 2024
No. 08-24-00328-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 1, 2024)
Case details for

Rago v. City of El Paso

Case Details

Full title:JEFFREY RAGO AND CHRISTINE RAGO, Appellants, v. CITY OF EL PASO, Appellee.

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Eighth District, El Paso

Date published: Nov 1, 2024

Citations

No. 08-24-00328-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 1, 2024)