His findings should have been of facts only, and should not have included evidence which he thought established as facts findings he made. Oldham v. Medearis, 90 Tex. 506, 39 S.W. 919; Thompson v. Mills, 45 Tex. Civ. App. 642, 101 S.W. 560; Gordon v. McCall, 20 Tex. Civ. App. 283, 48 S.W. 1111; Lumber Co. v. Hare, 61 Tex. Civ. App. 509, 130 S.W. 864; Barnes v. Riley, 145 S.W. 292. But, if the rule were otherwise, we would not be authorized to consider appellant's complaints, because it does not appear from the record that he requested the court to make the findings he says the court should have made.