From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ragland v. City of St. Louis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Sep 8, 2011
Case No. 10-13484 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 8, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 10-13484

09-08-2011

KEVIN DARNELL RAGLAND, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF ST. LOUIS, MICHIGAN, et al., Defendants.


HONORABLE AVERN COHN


ORDER OVERRULING PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS (Doc. 57)


I.

This is a prisoner civil rights case under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims that defendants, the City of St. Louis, Michigan and various individuals, violated his constitutional rights. The complaint stems from plaintiff's incarceration in the St. Louis Correctional Facility. One of plaintiff's allegations is that the City of St. Louis violated the Eighth Amendment by supplying unsafe drinking water to the prison. The matter was referred to a magistrate judge for all pretrial proceedings. The City of St. Louis filed a motion to dismiss or for summary judgment. The magistrate judge issued a report and recommendation (MJRR), recommending that the motion be granted. Plaintiff did not timely object to the MJRR. Accordingly, the Court adopted the MJRR and granted the City of St. Louis' motion. Doc. 55. After the order was entered, the Court received plaintiff's objections which are now before the Court.

II.

The failure to file objections to the MJRR waives any further right to appeal. Smith v. Detroit Federation of Teachers Local 231, 829 F.2d 1370, 1373 (6th Cir. 1987). Likewise, the failure to object to the MJRR releases the Court from its duty to independently review the motion. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). However, the Court has reviewed the MJRR and agrees with the magistrate judge.

Accordingly, the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the Court. The City of St. Louis's motion to dismiss or for summary judgment is GRANTED. The City of St. Louis is DISMISSED as a party to this case.

SO ORDERED.

AVERN COHN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to Kevin Ragland, 191565, G. Robert Cotton Correctional Facility, 3500 N. Elm Road, Jackson, MI 49201 and the attorneys of record on this date, September 8, 2011, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

Julie Owens

Case Manager, (313) 234-5160


Summaries of

Ragland v. City of St. Louis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Sep 8, 2011
Case No. 10-13484 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 8, 2011)
Case details for

Ragland v. City of St. Louis

Case Details

Full title:KEVIN DARNELL RAGLAND, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF ST. LOUIS, MICHIGAN, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Sep 8, 2011

Citations

Case No. 10-13484 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 8, 2011)