From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rager v. Inch

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Sep 13, 2019
278 So. 3d 945 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Opinion

No. 1D18-1681

09-13-2019

Chad Michael RAGER, Petitioner, v. Mark S. INCH, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Respondent.

Chad Michael Rager, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Quentin Humphrey, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Chad Michael Rager, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Quentin Humphrey, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied on the merits.

Lewis, Osterhaus, and Kelsey, JJ., concur.

Summaries of

Rager v. Inch

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Sep 13, 2019
278 So. 3d 945 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
Case details for

Rager v. Inch

Case Details

Full title:CHAD MICHAEL RAGER, Petitioner, v. MARK S. INCH, Secretary, Florida…

Court:FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Sep 13, 2019

Citations

278 So. 3d 945 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)