From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rage v. Jaddou

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Feb 22, 2023
2:22-cv-00774-TL (W.D. Wash. Feb. 22, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-00774-TL

02-22-2023

ABDULKADIR HASSAN RAGE et al., Plaintiffs, v. UR MENDOZA JADDOU et al., Defendants.


MINUTE ORDER

The following Minute Order is made at the direction of the Court, the Honorable Tana Lin, United States District Judge:

(1) On February 1, 2023, the Parties filed a stipulated notice to extend Defendant's deadline to respond to the Complaint. Dkt. No. 21. This is the fifth extension of the response deadline filed by stipulation of the Parties. See also Dkt. Nos. 12, 16, 18, 20. Pursuant to section II(G) of Judge Lin's Standing Order, “[a] date may not be automatically extended or otherwise modified pursuant to this Section more than twice.”

(2) In accordance with the Court's standing order, the Parties are ORDERED to refile their request for extension as a stipulated motion, setting out good cause for the continued delay (see Fed.R.Civ.P. 16(b)(4)), and addressing what, if any, impact the requested extension will have on the case management deadlines previously set by the Court (see Dkt. No. 17).


Summaries of

Rage v. Jaddou

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Feb 22, 2023
2:22-cv-00774-TL (W.D. Wash. Feb. 22, 2023)
Case details for

Rage v. Jaddou

Case Details

Full title:ABDULKADIR HASSAN RAGE et al., Plaintiffs, v. UR MENDOZA JADDOU et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Feb 22, 2023

Citations

2:22-cv-00774-TL (W.D. Wash. Feb. 22, 2023)