From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rafferty v. Schatzman

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Oct 28, 1963
81 N.J. Super. 64 (App. Div. 1963)

Opinion

Argued October 28, 1963 —

Decided October 28, 1963.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, KILKENNY and COLLESTER.

Mr. John J. Rafferty argued the cause for appellant.

Mr. Warren W. Wilentz argued the cause for respondents Schatzman and Biro.

Mr. John A. Lynch appeared for respondent Middlesex Democratic County Committee.


The judgment of the Law Division is affirmed essentially for the reasons stated in the opinion filed by Judge HALPERN, 81 N.J. Super. 58 ( Law Div. 1963). We consider the statute, N.J.S.A. 19:27-11, as completely controlling.


Summaries of

Rafferty v. Schatzman

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Oct 28, 1963
81 N.J. Super. 64 (App. Div. 1963)
Case details for

Rafferty v. Schatzman

Case Details

Full title:JAMES S. RAFFERTY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. FRANK D. SCHATZMAN, COUNTY…

Court:Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division

Date published: Oct 28, 1963

Citations

81 N.J. Super. 64 (App. Div. 1963)
194 A.2d 591

Citing Cases

Seligson v. De Bruin

The election laws are considered as being in pari materia, an integrated whole. In re Keogh-Dwyer, 106 N.J.…

In re Smith

If the statute is ambiguous or conflicts with some other law, then the court must consider the election laws…